goto Appendx main menu Black on Black with
Light Gray Interior :
Ila Berman
text | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | notes
previous page 

As I move into the interior of the book, I pass across these layers that mediate between the cover and its interior content.  I am cutting across the frame.  My interest has been in how this frame has been constructed, what are its terms and assumptions, and what is the excess that it excludes as its ground.  These questions continue as I reach the very inside of this frame: the foreword by Jack Travis.  This foreword is a line of suture between interior and container, the inside of the frame, the outside of that which is contained.  Jack Travis is represented as simultaneously the container and the contained of the book, both and yet neither.  His photograph on the page that precedes the foreword isolates him from the photographs representing the other individuals contained within the book.  Yet his statement, in spite of the fact that it is sequentially placed first, is presented as simply one of a collection of similarly formatted essays documenting the architectural experience for African-Americans, a fabrication that might be read as revealing an effort to defer to the group the author is intending to represent while attempting to construct the apparent neutrality of his own position as editor.  This neutrality, however, is only apparent, and my intent here is to expose the inner workings of that frame. 

Jack Travis opens his discussion by introducing "Mr. Fellows," who is not only the first black American architect that he meets, but who comes to embody for Travis the stereotypical black architect: "a simple man with a small practice and a real sense of social responsibility"—a representation that for Travis negatively connotes the potential looming invisibility and lack of success (equated with the lack of a name) against which he and other blacks seeking a future in architecture will have to struggle.  He refers to "the plight of every black man, during the 1950's and early 1960's" and continues by acknowledging the difference that his generation can make by improving upon the situation because "men like Mr. Fellows fought through so many hardships" (p. 7).  Unfortunately Travis's unwitting references to the assumed maleness of architects that passed before him does a disservice to female architects such as Norma Merrick Sklarek (BArch 1950), who is profiled in his book.  In her efforts to become the first black female member of the the American Institute of Architects in 1966, Sklarek had undeniably to fight even more difficult battles against invisibility than her black male counterparts because of her double minority status, evidenced by the fact that she must continue to fight these battles today, even against men who apparently claim a heightened sensitivity to issues of exclusion and marginalization. Appendx 1 page break 94 | 95 
 
Travis presents this book not as "a historical, critical, or complete account of the contributions of black American architects," but as a "profile of a few significant individuals and their firms in current practice; to present people of color in architecture as positive role models and architecture as an alternative profession to black youth; and to further concern, beyond the 'life' of [Spike] Lee's film [Jungle Fever], that the plight of black Americans in our profession be seen as one of paramount importance" (p. 7).  For the time being, I will deal with the necessary interdependence of these first three statements while ignoring the last, given that the specific references to Spike Lee's film and its emphasis for Travis seem to evolve more out of the particular relationship he has with Lee (Travis was involved in the making of the film and possibly had an influence in the construction of its main character), rather than out of its real contributions to the issues of architecture and marginalization, which have been more critically developed in recent years in the areas of cultural criticism and architectural theory (although obviously with less of a popular impact than Lee's film).  Travis's statements demand critical unpackingnext page


text | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | notes
appendx inc.©1997